Comparison of the TRONXY VEHO-600 and VEHO-600 V2 large format printers
Differences and Features of Tronxy VEHO-600 and Tronxy VEHO-600 V2 3D Printers
The Tronxy VEHO-600 and Tronxy VEHO-600 V2 3D printers represent two different generations of machines with features to meet the needs of both amateur and professional users. This article focuses on comparing the two models and explaining key terms such as Marlin, Klipper, and CoreXY.
Tronxy VEHO-600 vs. Tronxy VEHO-600 V2
- Firmware:
- Tronxy VEHO-600: This older model uses Marlin firmware, which is very popular among 3D printer users due to its open nature and broad community support [3].
- Tronxy VEHO-600 V2: The newer version has switched to the Klipper firmware, which combines the computing power of a computer with one or more microcontrollers, allowing for faster and more accurate prints [4].
- Axis design:
- VEHO-600: The classic X/Y axis design that is more common in older models.
- VEHO-600 V2: The new model uses the more advanced CoreXY design, a Cartesian motion concept that allows for fast and accurate movements by parallelizing the kinematics. This means that the motors are stationary, which minimizes inertia and allows for higher printing speeds [5].
- Print speed:
- Thanks to the CoreXY design and the use of Klipper firmware, the VEHO-600 V2 can achieve higher print speeds, specifically up to 300 mm/s, a significant improvement over earlier models [1].
- Extruder and material specifications:
- VEHO-600: It uses BMG extruder which is suitable for materials such as PLA, TPU and ABS.
- VEHO-600 V2: This model features an all-metal mini extruder that supports a wider range of materials and allows printing at higher temperatures [2].
- Platform and Alignment:
- Both printers have a large printing area of 600 x 600 x 600 mm. In addition, the VEHO-600 V2 has more platform alignment points (36 points compared to 20 in the older model) for more accurate and stable printing [2].
- Control and connectivity:
- VEHO-600: Control via a 3.5-inch display with USB-B connectivity.
- VEHO-600 V2: Enhanced control via a 4.3-inch color touchscreen and improved connectivity options including Wi-Fi and Ethernet, allowing printing directly from a PC or mobile phone [2].
Explanation of key terms
- Marlin:
- Marlin is an open-source firmware, widely used in the 3D printing community due to its flexibility and support for different types of printers. It offers advanced features such as pad balancing, filament changing during printing, and print head motion optimization [3].
- Clipper:
- Klipper is firmware that uses the computing power of a PC in conjunction with the printer's microcontrollers. This allows for faster response times and more precise control over printing operations. It is also open-source and supported by a wide community of users [4].
- CoreXY:
- CoreXY is a Cartesian motion technique that uses parallel kinematics to reduce printhead inertia. This allows for faster and more accurate movements, making it ideal for modern 3D printers focused on high speed and precision printing [5].
Conclusion
The Tronxy VEHO-600 and Tronxy VEHO-600 V2 represent two different approaches to 3D printing, each offering their own advantages. The older model with Marlin firmware and classic X/Y axis design is still a solid choice, while the newer model with Klipper firmware, CoreXY design and higher print speeds brings more modern and powerful options for demanding users.
Quotes:
[3] https://www.3djake.cz/info/poradce-recenze-a-dalsi/firmware-marlin-nastaveni-a-zprovozneni
[4] https://www.klipper3d.org/
[6] https://atelier-dek.cz/geometrick%C3%A1-p%C5%99esnost-ve-stavebnictv%C3%AD-653
Question:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using Marlin firmware versus Klipper for 3D printing?
Answer:
Advantages and disadvantages of using Marlin firmware versus Klipper for 3D printing
Advantages of Marlin:
- Easier to install and configure: Marlin is easy to configure and install, which is especially beneficial for beginners [6].
- Wide community support: Marlin has a large community and a lot of tutorials and information available online [1].
- Support for a variety of displays: Marlin supports a wide range of displays, increasing flexibility in use [5].
- Comprehensive Temperature Control: It has sophisticated temperature control, which is key to achieving quality printing results [6].
Disadvantages of Marlin:
- Lower printing speed: Marlin generally does not support as high printing speeds as Klipper [5].
- Less flexible configuration: configuration adjustments may require firmware reflashing, which is less convenient [5].
Advantages of Klipper:
- Higher speed and print quality: with Input Shaper technology and modules like the ADXL345, Klipper offers higher speed and better print quality [2].
- Configuration files can be easily edited from anywhere via the web interface without the need for reflashing [5].
- Multi-Controller Support: Increased flexibility with the ability to add multiple controllers to a single printer [5].
Disadvantages of Klipper:
- More complex installation: installation of Klipper is more challenging and can be complicated for new users [1].
- Need for additional hardware: A Raspberry Pi or similar device is required for Klipper to function, which adds additional cost and complexity [1, [5].
- Limited display support: the Klipper only supports basic displays, which may be limiting for some users [1].
Conclusion
Marlin is advantageous for its simplicity and broad community support, while Klipper offers faster speeds and better print quality at the cost of more complex installation and the need for additional hardware. The choice between the two depends on user experience and specific printing needs.
Quotes:
[1] https://www.3dpedie.cz/navody/klipper-firmware/
[2] https://www.3djake.cz/sovol/klipper-screen
[3] https://all3dp.com/2/klipper-vs-marlin-difference/
[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/ender3/comments/1cl13p8/what_is_the_difference_between_marlin_and_klipper/
[5] https://www.obico.io/blog/klipper-versus-marlin-firmware/
The experiences of users who have switched from Marlin to Klipper and vice versa, and their motivations for this change, can be summarized as follows:
Switching from Marlin to Klipper:
Increased speed and print quality: users often seek increased speed and quality because Klipper offers advanced features such as Input Shaper, which reduces vibration and improves the overall quality of prints [3].
Configuration flexibility.
Advanced printer control: Klipper provides better temperature control and macro command support, allowing for finer tuning of the print [3].
Switching from Klipper to Marlin:
Simplicity and stability: many users prefer the stability and simplicity of Marlin, which is less demanding to install and configure [2].
Broad community support: Marlin has a long-standing strong community that can be very helpful in troubleshooting and providing support [3].
No additional device required: Marlin does not require an external device like the Raspberry Pi, which can be an advantage for less tech-savvy users [1].
Each firmware has its advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them often depends on the specific needs and experience of the user.
Overall evaluation of printers.
It is a fairly successful mechanical design that is still being improved and can be used to build a very high quality large format printer. It should be noted that competitive FDM printers of this size are priced around 3800-4500USD
We are gradually preparing HW and SW upgrades for both variants, including replacement of control electronics from BTT, nozzle height sensing on d pad using eddy currents, replacement of the riser plate with a cast aluminium plate 600x600x10mm and changing the Z axis to full 4 point levelling e.g. see VORON